February 25, 2025

PN, ASA, ISO - Technical Correspondences and Selection of Flanges

PN, ASA, ISO - Technical Correspondences and Selection of Flanges

PN, ASA, ISO - Technical Correspondences and Selection of Flanges

Comparative infographic of industrial flange standards PN (Europe), ASA/ASME Class (North America), and ISO PN (petrochemical), including explanations of nominal pressures and visual representations of metal flanges, with the Vameca logo at the bottom.


In industrial valve technology, choosing the type of flange is far more than a matter of dimensions. It is a critical factor that affects the safety, compatibility, and compliance of a project.

In North America and Europe, flanges adhere to different standards: PN (nominal pressure) in Europe, ASME in North America, and ISO PN in specific petrochemical markets. Misinterpreting these standards can lead to delays, additional costs, and disputes during acceptance.

This guide clarifies the significant differences and offers practical benchmarks for your specifications.

1. PN, ASME, ISO: three different logics

PN (Nominal Pressure) — European approach

  • The designation PN (e.g., PN 10, PN 25, PN 40) corresponds to a maximum pressure in bar at ambient temperature.

  • Example: PN 10 = 10 bar max at 20 °C.

  • However, note: as the temperature increases, the mechanical strength of the flange decreases.

ASME Class — North American approach

  • In North America, ASME pressure classes are used (e.g., Class 150, 300, 600…).

  • These classes are not expressed in bar but define specific pressure/temperature ranges according to the material (carbon steel, stainless steel, alloy…).

  • Main reference: ASME B16.5 (flanges up to NPS 24) and ASME B16.47 (beyond).

ISO PN — a hybrid standard

  • Some petrochemical industries use ISO PN (PN 20, 50, 100…), similar to American classes but without perfect equivalence.

  • Indicative example:

    • ISO PN 20 ≈ Class 150

    • ISO PN 50 ≈ Class 300

    • ISO PN 100 ≈ Class 600

    • ISO PN 150 ≈ Class 900

    • ISO PN 250 ≈ Class 1500

    • ISO PN 420 ≈ Class 2500

👉 Key takeaway: a PN 100 is not equivalent to an ISO PN 100. This confusion is common and must be contractually clarified.

2. Drilling and dimensional compatibilities

Another common pitfall lies in flange drilling (number of holes and bolt circle diameter):

  • DN 15 to DN 50: identical drilling for PN 10/16/25/40.

  • DN 65 to DN 150: identical drilling for PN 10/16 as well as for 25/40.

This sometimes allows for mechanical interchangeability but not pressure/temperature compatibility.

3. Types of flange faces

The type of face plays a crucial role in sealing:

  • RF (Raised Face): most common standard.

  • FF (Flat Face): used on cast iron or low-pressure applications.

  • RTJ (Ring Type Joint): special machining for high pressures/temperatures and hazardous fluids.

  • Stamped Collar: avoid for sleeve valves and high pressures.

👉 For toxic fluids, significant pressures, or high temperatures, prioritize RTJ faces or special machinings.

4. Practical comparison PN ↔ ASA ↔ ISO

Standard

Example

Typical Application

PN (Europe)

PN 10, PN 40

Water, heating, utilities

ASME Class

Class 150, Class 300…

North America, heavy industries

ISO PN (petrochemical)

PN 20, 50, 100…

Refining, international projects

👉 In North America, ASME B16.5 is the indispensable reference. Equivalence tables are only used to translate a European specification, never for dimensioning.

5. Common risks and how to avoid them

PN / Class Confusion

➡️ Risk: specifying PN 40 in a Canadian project → supplier misunderstanding.
✅ Solution: always translate to ASME Class for the NA market.

Mixing PN and ISO PN

➡️ Risk: believing a PN 100 = ISO PN 100 → non-compliance at acceptance.
✅ Solution: require written validation from the client and specify the exact standard.

Wrong choice of flange face

➡️ Risk: leakage or incompatibility with the gasket.
✅ Solution: specify the face (RF, RTJ, FF) and the associated gasket class in the specification.

6. Best practices for purchasing and specification

  1. Always start with ASME B16.5/B16.47 if the project is North American.

  2. Translate European PN into Class using an indicative table, but always verify pressure/temperature curves.

  3. Specify the flange face (RF, FF, RTJ) according to the fluid and pressure.

  4. Document material certificates (NA compliant MTRs, EN 10204 accepted if equivalencies).

  5. Check local availability of gaskets and flanges to avoid downtime.

7. Practical Cases

  • Municipal potable water project: Class 150 RF, epoxy-coated ductile iron body, FF gaskets.

  • High-pressure steam project: Class 600 RF, steel body, metal/graphite spiral-wound gaskets.

  • Refinery project: Class 900 RTJ, alloy steel body, API 6FA fire-safe requirements.

Conclusion

The selection and specification of flanges determine the safety, compliance, and durability of an installation.

👉 Best practice in North America:

  • communicate in ASME Class rather than PN,

  • check flange face and gasket compatibility,

  • clarify any ISO PN reference before ordering.


Reliable equipment, timely delivery, and technical support that meets your stringent requirements.

Reliable equipment, timely delivery, and technical support that meets your stringent requirements.

Our role is to provide you with the right equipment, at the right time, to ensure the continuity of your industrial operations.

Our role is to provide you with the right equipment, at the right time, to ensure the continuity of your industrial operations.

Our role is to provide you with the right equipment, at the right time, to ensure the continuity of your industrial operations.

  • Compliant equipment

  • Optimized availability

  • Technical advice

  • Business tracking

  • Renowned manufacturers

  • Compliant equipment

  • Optimized availability

  • Technical advice

  • Business tracking

  • Renowned manufacturers